NutriBase

Alaska Pollock, Raw vs Fish, Mackerel: Nutrition Comparison

Compare calories, protein, fat, carbs, vitamins and minerals per 100 g. Values shaded green are generally the more favorable ones.

Key differences

  • Fish, Mackerel has more calories; Alaska Pollock, Raw is lower in calories.
  • Fish, Mackerel has more protein per 100 g.
  • Fish, Mackerel is notably higher in iron.
  • Fish, Mackerel is notably higher in calcium.

Nutrient comparison (per 100 g)

Nutrient Alaska Pollock, Raw Fish, Mackerel
Calories 78.5 kcal 305 kcal
Protein 17.3 g 18.5 g
Total Fat 1 g 25.1 g
Saturated Fat 0.2 g 7.2 g
Carbohydrate 0.1 g 0 g
Dietary Fiber 0 g 0 g
Total Sugars 0 g
Sodium 114.8 mg 4,450 mg
Potassium 353 mg 520 mg
Calcium 40.4 mg 66 mg
Iron 0.2 mg 1.4 mg
Magnesium 22.8 mg 60 mg
Vitamin C 0 mg
Vitamin A 2.6 mcg 47 mcg
Vitamin D 0 mcg 25.2 mcg
Cholesterol 60 mg 95 mg

Green highlighting marks the more favorable value where it applies (for example, more protein or less saturated fat). Neutral nutrients are not highlighted.

Data source: USDA FoodData Central. Values are per 100 g of edible portion and are reference figures — they vary by variety, preparation and brand. Last updated: 2026-04-30.

Alaska Pollock, Raw

  • Protein 88.3%
  • Fat 11.4%
  • Carbs 0.3%

Fish, Mackerel

  • Protein 24.7%
  • Fat 75.3%
  • Carbs 0%

Frequently asked questions

Which has more calories, Alaska Pollock, Raw or Fish, Mackerel?
Per 100 g: Alaska Pollock, Raw has 78 kcal, Fish, Mackerel has 305 kcal.
Which has more protein, Alaska Pollock, Raw or Fish, Mackerel?
Per 100 g: Alaska Pollock, Raw has 17.3 g of protein, Fish, Mackerel has 18.5 g.

Compare with other foods

Note. This information is provided for general reference only and is not medical advice or a diet prescription. If you have a medical condition or special dietary needs, consult a physician or a registered dietitian.