NutriBase

Alaska Pollock, Raw vs Fish, Mackerel: Nutrition Comparison

Compare calories, protein, fat, carbs, vitamins and minerals per 100 g. Values shaded green are generally the more favorable ones.

Key differences

  • Fish, Mackerel has more calories; Alaska Pollock, Raw is lower in calories.
  • Fish, Mackerel has more protein per 100 g.
  • Fish, Mackerel is notably higher in iron.
  • Alaska Pollock, Raw is notably higher in calcium.

Nutrient comparison (per 100 g)

Nutrient Alaska Pollock, Raw Fish, Mackerel
Calories 78.5 kcal 205 kcal
Protein 17.3 g 18.6 g
Total Fat 1 g 13.9 g
Saturated Fat 0.2 g 3.3 g
Carbohydrate 0.1 g 0 g
Dietary Fiber 0 g 0 g
Total Sugars 0 g
Sodium 114.8 mg 90 mg
Potassium 353 mg 314 mg
Calcium 40.4 mg 12 mg
Iron 0.2 mg 1.6 mg
Magnesium 22.8 mg 76 mg
Vitamin C 0.4 mg
Vitamin A 2.6 mcg 50 mcg
Vitamin D 0 mcg 16.1 mcg
Cholesterol 60 mg 70 mg

Green highlighting marks the more favorable value where it applies (for example, more protein or less saturated fat). Neutral nutrients are not highlighted.

Data source: USDA FoodData Central. Values are per 100 g of edible portion and are reference figures — they vary by variety, preparation and brand. Last updated: 2026-04-30.

Alaska Pollock, Raw

  • Protein 88.3%
  • Fat 11.4%
  • Carbs 0.3%

Fish, Mackerel

  • Protein 37.3%
  • Fat 62.7%
  • Carbs 0%

Frequently asked questions

Which has more calories, Alaska Pollock, Raw or Fish, Mackerel?
Per 100 g: Alaska Pollock, Raw has 78 kcal, Fish, Mackerel has 205 kcal.
Which has more protein, Alaska Pollock, Raw or Fish, Mackerel?
Per 100 g: Alaska Pollock, Raw has 17.3 g of protein, Fish, Mackerel has 18.6 g.

Compare with other foods

Note. This information is provided for general reference only and is not medical advice or a diet prescription. If you have a medical condition or special dietary needs, consult a physician or a registered dietitian.