NutriBase

Cod, Pacific Or Alaskan vs Fish, Sucker: Nutrition Comparison

Compare calories, protein, fat, carbs, vitamins and minerals per 100 g. Values shaded green are generally the more favorable ones.

Key differences

  • Fish, Sucker has more calories; Cod, Pacific Or Alaskan is lower in calories.
  • Fish, Sucker has more protein per 100 g.
  • Fish, Sucker is notably higher in calcium.
  • Fish, Sucker is notably higher in potassium.

Nutrient comparison (per 100 g)

Nutrient Cod, Pacific Or Alaskan Fish, Sucker
Calories 60.8 kcal 92 kcal
Protein 14.2 g 16.8 g
Total Fat 0.2 g 2.3 g
Saturated Fat 0.5 g
Carbohydrate 0.5 g 0 g
Dietary Fiber 0 g
Total Sugars
Sodium 353.9 mg 40 mg
Potassium 192.3 mg 380 mg
Calcium 9 mg 70 mg
Iron 0 mg 1.3 mg
Magnesium 17.9 mg 30 mg
Vitamin C 0 mg
Vitamin A 51 mcg
Vitamin D
Cholesterol 41 mg

Green highlighting marks the more favorable value where it applies (for example, more protein or less saturated fat). Neutral nutrients are not highlighted.

Data source: USDA FoodData Central. Values are per 100 g of edible portion and are reference figures — they vary by variety, preparation and brand. Last updated: 2026-04-30.

Cod, Pacific Or Alaskan

  • Protein 93.3%
  • Fat 3.3%
  • Carbs 3.4%

Fish, Sucker

  • Protein 76.3%
  • Fat 23.7%
  • Carbs 0%

Frequently asked questions

Which has more calories, Cod, Pacific Or Alaskan or Fish, Sucker?
Per 100 g: Cod, Pacific Or Alaskan has 61 kcal, Fish, Sucker has 92 kcal.
Which has more protein, Cod, Pacific Or Alaskan or Fish, Sucker?
Per 100 g: Cod, Pacific Or Alaskan has 14.2 g of protein, Fish, Sucker has 16.8 g.

Compare with other foods

Note. This information is provided for general reference only and is not medical advice or a diet prescription. If you have a medical condition or special dietary needs, consult a physician or a registered dietitian.