NutriBase

Bacon, Turkey vs Emu, Fan Fillet: Nutrition Comparison

Compare calories, protein, fat, carbs, vitamins and minerals per 100 g. Values shaded green are generally the more favorable ones.

Key differences

  • Bacon, Turkey has more calories; Emu, Fan Fillet is lower in calories.
  • Emu, Fan Fillet has more protein per 100 g.
  • Emu, Fan Fillet is notably higher in iron.
  • Bacon, Turkey is notably higher in calcium.
  • Emu, Fan Fillet is notably higher in potassium.

Nutrient comparison (per 100 g)

Nutrient Bacon, Turkey Emu, Fan Fillet
Calories 253 kcal 154 kcal
Protein 13.3 g 31.3 g
Total Fat 20 g 2.3 g
Saturated Fat 6.7 g 0.6 g
Carbohydrate 4.8 g 0 g
Dietary Fiber 0 g 0 g
Total Sugars 0 g 0 g
Sodium 900 mg 53 mg
Potassium 156 mg 397 mg
Calcium 10 mg 6 mg
Iron 0.7 mg 4.6 mg
Magnesium 19 mg 30 mg
Vitamin C 24 mg 0 mg
Vitamin A 8 mcg 0 mcg
Vitamin D 0.2 mcg
Cholesterol 100 mg 82 mg

Green highlighting marks the more favorable value where it applies (for example, more protein or less saturated fat). Neutral nutrients are not highlighted.

Data source: USDA FoodData Central. Values are per 100 g of edible portion and are reference figures — they vary by variety, preparation and brand. Last updated: 2026-04-30.

Bacon, Turkey

  • Protein 21.1%
  • Fat 71.3%
  • Carbs 7.6%

Emu, Fan Fillet

  • Protein 85.8%
  • Fat 14.2%
  • Carbs 0%

Frequently asked questions

Which has more calories, Bacon, Turkey or Emu, Fan Fillet?
Per 100 g: Bacon, Turkey has 253 kcal, Emu, Fan Fillet has 154 kcal.
Which has more protein, Bacon, Turkey or Emu, Fan Fillet?
Per 100 g: Bacon, Turkey has 13.3 g of protein, Emu, Fan Fillet has 31.3 g.

Compare with other foods

Note. This information is provided for general reference only and is not medical advice or a diet prescription. If you have a medical condition or special dietary needs, consult a physician or a registered dietitian.