NutriBase

Alaska Pollock, Raw vs Fish, Whiting: Nutrition Comparison

Compare calories, protein, fat, carbs, vitamins and minerals per 100 g. Values shaded green are generally the more favorable ones.

Key differences

  • Fish, Whiting has more calories; Alaska Pollock, Raw is lower in calories.
  • Fish, Whiting has more protein per 100 g.
  • Fish, Whiting is notably higher in iron.
  • Fish, Whiting is notably higher in calcium.

Nutrient comparison (per 100 g)

Nutrient Alaska Pollock, Raw Fish, Whiting
Calories 78.5 kcal 116 kcal
Protein 17.3 g 23.5 g
Total Fat 1 g 1.7 g
Saturated Fat 0.2 g 0.4 g
Carbohydrate 0.1 g 0 g
Dietary Fiber 0 g 0 g
Total Sugars 0 g
Sodium 114.8 mg 132 mg
Potassium 353 mg 434 mg
Calcium 40.4 mg 62 mg
Iron 0.2 mg 0.4 mg
Magnesium 22.8 mg 27 mg
Vitamin C 0 mg
Vitamin A 2.6 mcg 38 mcg
Vitamin D 0 mcg 1.8 mcg
Cholesterol 60 mg 84 mg

Green highlighting marks the more favorable value where it applies (for example, more protein or less saturated fat). Neutral nutrients are not highlighted.

Data source: USDA FoodData Central. Values are per 100 g of edible portion and are reference figures — they vary by variety, preparation and brand. Last updated: 2026-04-30.

Alaska Pollock, Raw

  • Protein 88.3%
  • Fat 11.4%
  • Carbs 0.3%

Fish, Whiting

  • Protein 86.1%
  • Fat 13.9%
  • Carbs 0%

Frequently asked questions

Which has more calories, Alaska Pollock, Raw or Fish, Whiting?
Per 100 g: Alaska Pollock, Raw has 78 kcal, Fish, Whiting has 116 kcal.
Which has more protein, Alaska Pollock, Raw or Fish, Whiting?
Per 100 g: Alaska Pollock, Raw has 17.3 g of protein, Fish, Whiting has 23.5 g.

Compare with other foods

Note. This information is provided for general reference only and is not medical advice or a diet prescription. If you have a medical condition or special dietary needs, consult a physician or a registered dietitian.