NutriBase

Alaska Pollock, Raw vs Fish, Tuna: Nutrition Comparison

Compare calories, protein, fat, carbs, vitamins and minerals per 100 g. Values shaded green are generally the more favorable ones.

Key differences

  • Fish, Tuna has more calories; Alaska Pollock, Raw is lower in calories.
  • Fish, Tuna has more protein per 100 g.
  • Fish, Tuna is notably higher in iron.
  • Alaska Pollock, Raw is notably higher in calcium.

Nutrient comparison (per 100 g)

Nutrient Alaska Pollock, Raw Fish, Tuna
Calories 78.5 kcal 128 kcal
Protein 17.3 g 23.6 g
Total Fat 1 g 3 g
Saturated Fat 0.2 g 0.8 g
Carbohydrate 0.1 g 0 g
Dietary Fiber 0 g 0 g
Total Sugars 0 g
Sodium 114.8 mg 377 mg
Potassium 353 mg 237 mg
Calcium 40.4 mg 14 mg
Iron 0.2 mg 1 mg
Magnesium 22.8 mg 33 mg
Vitamin C 0 mg
Vitamin A 2.6 mcg 6 mcg
Vitamin D 0 mcg 2 mcg
Cholesterol 60 mg 42 mg

Green highlighting marks the more favorable value where it applies (for example, more protein or less saturated fat). Neutral nutrients are not highlighted.

Data source: USDA FoodData Central. Values are per 100 g of edible portion and are reference figures — they vary by variety, preparation and brand. Last updated: 2026-04-30.

Alaska Pollock, Raw

  • Protein 88.3%
  • Fat 11.4%
  • Carbs 0.3%

Fish, Tuna

  • Protein 77.9%
  • Fat 22.1%
  • Carbs 0%

Frequently asked questions

Which has more calories, Alaska Pollock, Raw or Fish, Tuna?
Per 100 g: Alaska Pollock, Raw has 78 kcal, Fish, Tuna has 128 kcal.
Which has more protein, Alaska Pollock, Raw or Fish, Tuna?
Per 100 g: Alaska Pollock, Raw has 17.3 g of protein, Fish, Tuna has 23.6 g.

Compare with other foods

Note. This information is provided for general reference only and is not medical advice or a diet prescription. If you have a medical condition or special dietary needs, consult a physician or a registered dietitian.