NutriBase

Alaska Pollock, Raw vs Fish, Cusk: Nutrition Comparison

Compare calories, protein, fat, carbs, vitamins and minerals per 100 g. Values shaded green are generally the more favorable ones.

Key differences

  • Fish, Cusk has more calories; Alaska Pollock, Raw is lower in calories.
  • Fish, Cusk has more protein per 100 g.
  • Fish, Cusk is notably higher in iron.
  • Alaska Pollock, Raw is notably higher in calcium.

Nutrient comparison (per 100 g)

Nutrient Alaska Pollock, Raw Fish, Cusk
Calories 78.5 kcal 87 kcal
Protein 17.3 g 19 g
Total Fat 1 g 0.7 g
Saturated Fat 0.2 g 0.1 g
Carbohydrate 0.1 g 0 g
Dietary Fiber 0 g 0 g
Total Sugars
Sodium 114.8 mg 31 mg
Potassium 353 mg 392 mg
Calcium 40.4 mg 10 mg
Iron 0.2 mg 0.8 mg
Magnesium 22.8 mg 31 mg
Vitamin C 0 mg
Vitamin A 2.6 mcg 18 mcg
Vitamin D 0 mcg
Cholesterol 60 mg 41 mg

Green highlighting marks the more favorable value where it applies (for example, more protein or less saturated fat). Neutral nutrients are not highlighted.

Data source: USDA FoodData Central. Values are per 100 g of edible portion and are reference figures — they vary by variety, preparation and brand. Last updated: 2026-04-30.

Alaska Pollock, Raw

  • Protein 88.3%
  • Fat 11.4%
  • Carbs 0.3%

Fish, Cusk

  • Protein 92.4%
  • Fat 7.6%
  • Carbs 0%

Frequently asked questions

Which has more calories, Alaska Pollock, Raw or Fish, Cusk?
Per 100 g: Alaska Pollock, Raw has 78 kcal, Fish, Cusk has 87 kcal.
Which has more protein, Alaska Pollock, Raw or Fish, Cusk?
Per 100 g: Alaska Pollock, Raw has 17.3 g of protein, Fish, Cusk has 19 g.

Compare with other foods

Note. This information is provided for general reference only and is not medical advice or a diet prescription. If you have a medical condition or special dietary needs, consult a physician or a registered dietitian.