NutriBase

Bacon, Turkey vs Beef, Shank Crosscuts: Nutrition Comparison

Compare calories, protein, fat, carbs, vitamins and minerals per 100 g. Values shaded green are generally the more favorable ones.

Key differences

  • Bacon, Turkey has more calories; Beef, Shank Crosscuts is lower in calories.
  • Beef, Shank Crosscuts has more protein per 100 g.
  • Bacon, Turkey is notably higher in calcium.

Nutrient comparison (per 100 g)

Nutrient Bacon, Turkey Beef, Shank Crosscuts
Calories 368 kcal 201 kcal
Protein 29.5 g 33.7 g
Total Fat 25.9 g 6.4 g
Saturated Fat 6.9 g 2.3 g
Carbohydrate 4.2 g 0 g
Dietary Fiber 0 g 0 g
Total Sugars 4.2 g
Sodium 2,021 mg 64 mg
Potassium 666 mg 447 mg
Calcium 163 mg 32 mg
Iron 2.6 mg 3.9 mg
Magnesium 30 mg 30 mg
Vitamin C 0 mg 0 mg
Vitamin A 19 mcg 0 mcg
Vitamin D 1.2 mcg
Cholesterol 153 mg 78 mg

Green highlighting marks the more favorable value where it applies (for example, more protein or less saturated fat). Neutral nutrients are not highlighted.

Data source: USDA FoodData Central. Values are per 100 g of edible portion and are reference figures — they vary by variety, preparation and brand. Last updated: 2026-04-30.

Bacon, Turkey

  • Protein 32.1%
  • Fat 63.3%
  • Carbs 4.6%

Beef, Shank Crosscuts

  • Protein 70.2%
  • Fat 29.8%
  • Carbs 0%

Frequently asked questions

Which has more calories, Bacon, Turkey or Beef, Shank Crosscuts?
Per 100 g: Bacon, Turkey has 368 kcal, Beef, Shank Crosscuts has 201 kcal.
Which has more protein, Bacon, Turkey or Beef, Shank Crosscuts?
Per 100 g: Bacon, Turkey has 29.5 g of protein, Beef, Shank Crosscuts has 33.7 g.

Compare with other foods

Note. This information is provided for general reference only and is not medical advice or a diet prescription. If you have a medical condition or special dietary needs, consult a physician or a registered dietitian.