NutriBase

Bacon, Turkey vs Lamb, Foreshank: Nutrition Comparison

Compare calories, protein, fat, carbs, vitamins and minerals per 100 g. Values shaded green are generally the more favorable ones.

Key differences

  • Bacon, Turkey has more calories; Lamb, Foreshank is lower in calories.
  • Lamb, Foreshank has more protein per 100 g.
  • Lamb, Foreshank is notably higher in iron.
  • Lamb, Foreshank is notably higher in calcium.
  • Lamb, Foreshank is notably higher in potassium.

Nutrient comparison (per 100 g)

Nutrient Bacon, Turkey Lamb, Foreshank
Calories 253 kcal 187 kcal
Protein 13.3 g 31 g
Total Fat 20 g 6 g
Saturated Fat 6.7 g 2.2 g
Carbohydrate 4.8 g 0 g
Dietary Fiber 0 g 0 g
Total Sugars 0 g
Sodium 900 mg 74 mg
Potassium 156 mg 267 mg
Calcium 10 mg 20 mg
Iron 0.7 mg 2.3 mg
Magnesium 19 mg 23 mg
Vitamin C 24 mg 0 mg
Vitamin A 8 mcg 0 mcg
Vitamin D 0.2 mcg
Cholesterol 100 mg 104 mg

Green highlighting marks the more favorable value where it applies (for example, more protein or less saturated fat). Neutral nutrients are not highlighted.

Data source: USDA FoodData Central. Values are per 100 g of edible portion and are reference figures — they vary by variety, preparation and brand. Last updated: 2026-04-30.

Bacon, Turkey

  • Protein 21.1%
  • Fat 71.3%
  • Carbs 7.6%

Lamb, Foreshank

  • Protein 69.6%
  • Fat 30.4%
  • Carbs 0%

Frequently asked questions

Which has more calories, Bacon, Turkey or Lamb, Foreshank?
Per 100 g: Bacon, Turkey has 253 kcal, Lamb, Foreshank has 187 kcal.
Which has more protein, Bacon, Turkey or Lamb, Foreshank?
Per 100 g: Bacon, Turkey has 13.3 g of protein, Lamb, Foreshank has 31 g.

Compare with other foods

Note. This information is provided for general reference only and is not medical advice or a diet prescription. If you have a medical condition or special dietary needs, consult a physician or a registered dietitian.