NutriBase

Bacon, Turkey vs Kielbasa, Polish: Nutrition Comparison

Compare calories, protein, fat, carbs, vitamins and minerals per 100 g. Values shaded green are generally the more favorable ones.

Key differences

  • Bacon, Turkey has more calories; Kielbasa, Polish is lower in calories.
  • Bacon, Turkey has more protein per 100 g.
  • Kielbasa, Polish is notably higher in iron.
  • Bacon, Turkey is notably higher in vitamin c.

Nutrient comparison (per 100 g)

Nutrient Bacon, Turkey Kielbasa, Polish
Calories 253 kcal 226 kcal
Protein 13.3 g 13.1 g
Total Fat 20 g 17.6 g
Saturated Fat 6.7 g 6.2 g
Carbohydrate 4.8 g 3.9 g
Dietary Fiber 0 g 0 g
Total Sugars 0 g 0 g
Sodium 900 mg 1,200 mg
Potassium 156 mg
Calcium 10 mg
Iron 0.7 mg 1.2 mg
Magnesium 19 mg
Vitamin C 24 mg 14.8 mg
Vitamin A 8 mcg 0 mcg
Vitamin D 0.2 mcg
Cholesterol 100 mg 70 mg

Green highlighting marks the more favorable value where it applies (for example, more protein or less saturated fat). Neutral nutrients are not highlighted.

Data source: USDA FoodData Central. Values are per 100 g of edible portion and are reference figures — they vary by variety, preparation and brand. Last updated: 2026-04-30.

Bacon, Turkey

  • Protein 21.1%
  • Fat 71.3%
  • Carbs 7.6%

Kielbasa, Polish

  • Protein 23.1%
  • Fat 70%
  • Carbs 6.9%

Frequently asked questions

Which has more calories, Bacon, Turkey or Kielbasa, Polish?
Per 100 g: Bacon, Turkey has 253 kcal, Kielbasa, Polish has 226 kcal.
Which has more protein, Bacon, Turkey or Kielbasa, Polish?
Per 100 g: Bacon, Turkey has 13.3 g of protein, Kielbasa, Polish has 13.1 g.

Compare with other foods

Note. This information is provided for general reference only and is not medical advice or a diet prescription. If you have a medical condition or special dietary needs, consult a physician or a registered dietitian.