NutriBase

Bacon, Turkey vs Emu, Full Rump: Nutrition Comparison

Compare calories, protein, fat, carbs, vitamins and minerals per 100 g. Values shaded green are generally the more favorable ones.

Key differences

  • Bacon, Turkey has more calories; Emu, Full Rump is lower in calories.
  • Emu, Full Rump has more protein per 100 g.
  • Emu, Full Rump is notably higher in iron.
  • Bacon, Turkey is notably higher in calcium.
  • Emu, Full Rump is notably higher in potassium.

Nutrient comparison (per 100 g)

Nutrient Bacon, Turkey Emu, Full Rump
Calories 253 kcal 112 kcal
Protein 13.3 g 22.8 g
Total Fat 20 g 1.6 g
Saturated Fat 6.7 g 0.5 g
Carbohydrate 4.8 g 0 g
Dietary Fiber 0 g 0 g
Total Sugars 0 g 0 g
Sodium 900 mg 90 mg
Potassium 156 mg 330 mg
Calcium 10 mg 4 mg
Iron 0.7 mg 5 mg
Magnesium 19 mg 40 mg
Vitamin C 24 mg 0 mg
Vitamin A 8 mcg 4 mcg
Vitamin D 0.2 mcg
Cholesterol 100 mg 85 mg

Green highlighting marks the more favorable value where it applies (for example, more protein or less saturated fat). Neutral nutrients are not highlighted.

Data source: USDA FoodData Central. Values are per 100 g of edible portion and are reference figures — they vary by variety, preparation and brand. Last updated: 2026-04-30.

Bacon, Turkey

  • Protein 21.1%
  • Fat 71.3%
  • Carbs 7.6%

Emu, Full Rump

  • Protein 86.1%
  • Fat 13.9%
  • Carbs 0%

Frequently asked questions

Which has more calories, Bacon, Turkey or Emu, Full Rump?
Per 100 g: Bacon, Turkey has 253 kcal, Emu, Full Rump has 112 kcal.
Which has more protein, Bacon, Turkey or Emu, Full Rump?
Per 100 g: Bacon, Turkey has 13.3 g of protein, Emu, Full Rump has 22.8 g.

Compare with other foods

Note. This information is provided for general reference only and is not medical advice or a diet prescription. If you have a medical condition or special dietary needs, consult a physician or a registered dietitian.