NutriBase

Baking Chocolate, Mars Snackfood Us vs Sugars, Maple: Nutrition Comparison

Compare calories, protein, fat, carbs, vitamins and minerals per 100 g. Values shaded green are generally the more favorable ones.

Key differences

  • Baking Chocolate, Mars Snackfood Us has more calories; Sugars, Maple is lower in calories.
  • Baking Chocolate, Mars Snackfood Us has more protein per 100 g.
  • Baking Chocolate, Mars Snackfood Us is notably higher in iron.
  • Sugars, Maple is notably higher in calcium.

Nutrient comparison (per 100 g)

Nutrient Baking Chocolate, Mars Snackfood Us Sugars, Maple
Calories 517 kcal 354 kcal
Protein 4.4 g 0.1 g
Total Fat 26.2 g 0.2 g
Saturated Fat 15.6 g 0 g
Carbohydrate 66 g 90.9 g
Dietary Fiber 6.7 g 0 g
Total Sugars 53.1 g 84.9 g
Sodium 2 mg 11 mg
Potassium 274 mg
Calcium 34 mg 90 mg
Iron 2.9 mg 1.6 mg
Magnesium 19 mg
Vitamin C 0 mg 0 mg
Vitamin A 0 mcg
Vitamin D 0 mcg
Cholesterol 3 mg 0 mg

Green highlighting marks the more favorable value where it applies (for example, more protein or less saturated fat). Neutral nutrients are not highlighted.

Data source: USDA FoodData Central. Values are per 100 g of edible portion and are reference figures — they vary by variety, preparation and brand. Last updated: 2026-04-30.

Baking Chocolate, Mars Snackfood Us

  • Protein 3.5%
  • Fat 46.7%
  • Carbs 49.7%

Sugars, Maple

  • Protein 0.1%
  • Fat 0.5%
  • Carbs 99.4%

Frequently asked questions

Which has more calories, Baking Chocolate, Mars Snackfood Us or Sugars, Maple?
Per 100 g: Baking Chocolate, Mars Snackfood Us has 517 kcal, Sugars, Maple has 354 kcal.
Which has more protein, Baking Chocolate, Mars Snackfood Us or Sugars, Maple?
Per 100 g: Baking Chocolate, Mars Snackfood Us has 4.4 g of protein, Sugars, Maple has 0.1 g.

Compare with other foods

Note. This information is provided for general reference only and is not medical advice or a diet prescription. If you have a medical condition or special dietary needs, consult a physician or a registered dietitian.