NutriBase

Bacon, Turkey vs Emu, Full Rump: Nutrition Comparison

Compare calories, protein, fat, carbs, vitamins and minerals per 100 g. Values shaded green are generally the more favorable ones.

Key differences

  • Bacon, Turkey has more calories; Emu, Full Rump is lower in calories.
  • Emu, Full Rump has more protein per 100 g.
  • Emu, Full Rump is notably higher in iron.
  • Bacon, Turkey is notably higher in calcium.
  • Bacon, Turkey is notably higher in potassium.

Nutrient comparison (per 100 g)

Nutrient Bacon, Turkey Emu, Full Rump
Calories 368 kcal 168 kcal
Protein 29.5 g 33.7 g
Total Fat 25.9 g 2.7 g
Saturated Fat 6.9 g 0.9 g
Carbohydrate 4.2 g 0 g
Dietary Fiber 0 g 0 g
Total Sugars 4.2 g 0 g
Sodium 2,021 mg 110 mg
Potassium 666 mg 324 mg
Calcium 163 mg 7 mg
Iron 2.6 mg 6.9 mg
Magnesium 30 mg 34 mg
Vitamin C 0 mg 0 mg
Vitamin A 19 mcg 3 mcg
Vitamin D 1.2 mcg
Cholesterol 153 mg 129 mg

Green highlighting marks the more favorable value where it applies (for example, more protein or less saturated fat). Neutral nutrients are not highlighted.

Data source: USDA FoodData Central. Values are per 100 g of edible portion and are reference figures — they vary by variety, preparation and brand. Last updated: 2026-04-30.

Bacon, Turkey

  • Protein 32.1%
  • Fat 63.3%
  • Carbs 4.6%

Emu, Full Rump

  • Protein 84.8%
  • Fat 15.2%
  • Carbs 0%

Frequently asked questions

Which has more calories, Bacon, Turkey or Emu, Full Rump?
Per 100 g: Bacon, Turkey has 368 kcal, Emu, Full Rump has 168 kcal.
Which has more protein, Bacon, Turkey or Emu, Full Rump?
Per 100 g: Bacon, Turkey has 29.5 g of protein, Emu, Full Rump has 33.7 g.

Compare with other foods

Note. This information is provided for general reference only and is not medical advice or a diet prescription. If you have a medical condition or special dietary needs, consult a physician or a registered dietitian.