NutriBase

Archway Home Style Cookies vs Oat Bran, Cooked: Nutrition Comparison

Compare calories, protein, fat, carbs, vitamins and minerals per 100 g. Values shaded green are generally the more favorable ones.

Key differences

  • Archway Home Style Cookies has more calories; Oat Bran, Cooked is lower in calories.
  • Archway Home Style Cookies has more protein per 100 g.
  • Archway Home Style Cookies is notably higher in iron.
  • Archway Home Style Cookies is notably higher in calcium.

Nutrient comparison (per 100 g)

Nutrient Archway Home Style Cookies Oat Bran, Cooked
Calories 468 kcal 40 kcal
Protein 5.2 g 3.2 g
Total Fat 17.6 g 0.9 g
Saturated Fat 3.8 g 0.2 g
Carbohydrate 72.2 g 11.4 g
Dietary Fiber 1.8 g 2.6 g
Total Sugars 32.6 g
Sodium 471 mg 1 mg
Potassium 113 mg 92 mg
Calcium 36 mg 10 mg
Iron 3.1 mg 0.9 mg
Magnesium 40 mg
Vitamin C 0 mg 0 mg
Vitamin A 0 mcg
Vitamin D 0 mcg
Cholesterol 1 mg 0 mg

Green highlighting marks the more favorable value where it applies (for example, more protein or less saturated fat). Neutral nutrients are not highlighted.

Data source: USDA FoodData Central. Values are per 100 g of edible portion and are reference figures — they vary by variety, preparation and brand. Last updated: 2026-04-30.

Archway Home Style Cookies

  • Protein 4.5%
  • Fat 34%
  • Carbs 61.5%

Oat Bran, Cooked

  • Protein 21%
  • Fat 12.7%
  • Carbs 66.3%

Frequently asked questions

Which has more calories, Archway Home Style Cookies or Oat Bran, Cooked?
Per 100 g: Archway Home Style Cookies has 468 kcal, Oat Bran, Cooked has 40 kcal.
Which has more protein, Archway Home Style Cookies or Oat Bran, Cooked?
Per 100 g: Archway Home Style Cookies has 5.2 g of protein, Oat Bran, Cooked has 3.2 g.

Compare with other foods

Note. This information is provided for general reference only and is not medical advice or a diet prescription. If you have a medical condition or special dietary needs, consult a physician or a registered dietitian.