NutriBase

Amaranth Grain, Cooked vs Triticale: Nutrition Comparison

Compare calories, protein, fat, carbs, vitamins and minerals per 100 g. Values shaded green are generally the more favorable ones.

Key differences

  • Triticale has more calories; Amaranth Grain, Cooked is lower in calories.
  • Triticale has more protein per 100 g.
  • Triticale is notably higher in potassium.

Nutrient comparison (per 100 g)

Nutrient Amaranth Grain, Cooked Triticale
Calories 102 kcal 336 kcal
Protein 3.8 g 13.1 g
Total Fat 1.6 g 2.1 g
Saturated Fat 0.4 g
Carbohydrate 18.7 g 72.1 g
Dietary Fiber 2.1 g
Total Sugars
Sodium 6 mg 5 mg
Potassium 135 mg 332 mg
Calcium 47 mg 37 mg
Iron 2.1 mg 2.6 mg
Magnesium 65 mg 130 mg
Vitamin C 0 mg
Vitamin A 0 mcg
Vitamin D 0 mcg
Cholesterol 0 mg

Green highlighting marks the more favorable value where it applies (for example, more protein or less saturated fat). Neutral nutrients are not highlighted.

Data source: USDA FoodData Central. Values are per 100 g of edible portion and are reference figures — they vary by variety, preparation and brand. Last updated: 2026-04-30.

Amaranth Grain, Cooked

  • Protein 15.2%
  • Fat 14.2%
  • Carbs 70.6%

Triticale

  • Protein 14.5%
  • Fat 5.2%
  • Carbs 80.2%

Frequently asked questions

Which has more calories, Amaranth Grain, Cooked or Triticale?
Per 100 g: Amaranth Grain, Cooked has 102 kcal, Triticale has 336 kcal.
Which has more protein, Amaranth Grain, Cooked or Triticale?
Per 100 g: Amaranth Grain, Cooked has 3.8 g of protein, Triticale has 13.1 g.

Compare with other foods

Note. This information is provided for general reference only and is not medical advice or a diet prescription. If you have a medical condition or special dietary needs, consult a physician or a registered dietitian.