NutriBase

Fish, Tuna vs Mollusks, Octopus: Nutrition Comparison

Compare calories, protein, fat, carbs, vitamins and minerals per 100 g. Values shaded green are generally the more favorable ones.

Key differences

  • Fish, Tuna has more calories; Mollusks, Octopus is lower in calories.
  • Fish, Tuna has more protein per 100 g.
  • Mollusks, Octopus is notably higher in iron.
  • Mollusks, Octopus is notably higher in calcium.
  • Mollusks, Octopus is notably higher in potassium.

Nutrient comparison (per 100 g)

Nutrient Fish, Tuna Mollusks, Octopus
Calories 184 kcal 164 kcal
Protein 29.9 g 29.8 g
Total Fat 6.3 g 2.1 g
Saturated Fat 1.6 g 0.5 g
Carbohydrate 0 g 4.4 g
Dietary Fiber 0 g 0 g
Total Sugars 0 g
Sodium 50 mg 460 mg
Potassium 323 mg 630 mg
Calcium 10 mg 106 mg
Iron 1.3 mg 9.5 mg
Magnesium 64 mg 60 mg
Vitamin C 0 mg 8 mg
Vitamin A 757 mcg 90 mcg
Vitamin D 0 mcg
Cholesterol 49 mg 96 mg

Green highlighting marks the more favorable value where it applies (for example, more protein or less saturated fat). Neutral nutrients are not highlighted.

Data source: USDA FoodData Central. Values are per 100 g of edible portion and are reference figures — they vary by variety, preparation and brand. Last updated: 2026-04-30.

Fish, Tuna

  • Protein 67.9%
  • Fat 32.1%
  • Carbs 0%

Mollusks, Octopus

  • Protein 76.7%
  • Fat 12%
  • Carbs 11.3%

Frequently asked questions

Which has more calories, Fish, Tuna or Mollusks, Octopus?
Per 100 g: Fish, Tuna has 184 kcal, Mollusks, Octopus has 164 kcal.
Which has more protein, Fish, Tuna or Mollusks, Octopus?
Per 100 g: Fish, Tuna has 29.9 g of protein, Mollusks, Octopus has 29.8 g.

Compare with other foods

Note. This information is provided for general reference only and is not medical advice or a diet prescription. If you have a medical condition or special dietary needs, consult a physician or a registered dietitian.