NutriBase

Baking Chocolate, Mars Snackfood Us vs Snacks, Pork Skins: Nutrition Comparison

Compare calories, protein, fat, carbs, vitamins and minerals per 100 g. Values shaded green are generally the more favorable ones.

Key differences

  • Snacks, Pork Skins has more calories; Baking Chocolate, Mars Snackfood Us is lower in calories.
  • Snacks, Pork Skins has more protein per 100 g.
  • Baking Chocolate, Mars Snackfood Us is notably higher in iron.

Nutrient comparison (per 100 g)

Nutrient Baking Chocolate, Mars Snackfood Us Snacks, Pork Skins
Calories 517 kcal 544 kcal
Protein 4.4 g 61.3 g
Total Fat 26.2 g 31.3 g
Saturated Fat 15.6 g 11.4 g
Carbohydrate 66 g 0 g
Dietary Fiber 6.7 g 0 g
Total Sugars 53.1 g 0 g
Sodium 2 mg 1,818 mg
Potassium 127 mg
Calcium 34 mg 30 mg
Iron 2.9 mg 0.9 mg
Magnesium 11 mg
Vitamin C 0 mg 0.5 mg
Vitamin A 12 mcg
Vitamin D 0 mcg
Cholesterol 3 mg 95 mg

Green highlighting marks the more favorable value where it applies (for example, more protein or less saturated fat). Neutral nutrients are not highlighted.

Data source: USDA FoodData Central. Values are per 100 g of edible portion and are reference figures — they vary by variety, preparation and brand. Last updated: 2026-04-30.

Baking Chocolate, Mars Snackfood Us

  • Protein 3.5%
  • Fat 46.7%
  • Carbs 49.7%

Snacks, Pork Skins

  • Protein 46.5%
  • Fat 53.5%
  • Carbs 0%

Frequently asked questions

Which has more calories, Baking Chocolate, Mars Snackfood Us or Snacks, Pork Skins?
Per 100 g: Baking Chocolate, Mars Snackfood Us has 517 kcal, Snacks, Pork Skins has 544 kcal.
Which has more protein, Baking Chocolate, Mars Snackfood Us or Snacks, Pork Skins?
Per 100 g: Baking Chocolate, Mars Snackfood Us has 4.4 g of protein, Snacks, Pork Skins has 61.3 g.

Compare with other foods

Note. This information is provided for general reference only and is not medical advice or a diet prescription. If you have a medical condition or special dietary needs, consult a physician or a registered dietitian.