NutriBase

Andrea'S vs Teff, Cooked: Nutrition Comparison

Compare calories, protein, fat, carbs, vitamins and minerals per 100 g. Values shaded green are generally the more favorable ones.

Key differences

  • Andrea'S has more calories; Teff, Cooked is lower in calories.
  • Andrea'S has more protein per 100 g.
  • Teff, Cooked is notably higher in iron.
  • Andrea'S is notably higher in potassium.

Nutrient comparison (per 100 g)

Nutrient Andrea'S Teff, Cooked
Calories 257 kcal 101 kcal
Protein 5.7 g 3.9 g
Total Fat 8.2 g 0.7 g
Saturated Fat
Carbohydrate 40.2 g 19.9 g
Dietary Fiber 2.9 g 2.8 g
Total Sugars 3 g
Sodium 544 mg 8 mg
Potassium 165 mg 107 mg
Calcium 41 mg 49 mg
Iron 0.9 mg 2.1 mg
Magnesium 42 mg 50 mg
Vitamin C
Vitamin A 0 mcg
Vitamin D
Cholesterol 0 mg

Green highlighting marks the more favorable value where it applies (for example, more protein or less saturated fat). Neutral nutrients are not highlighted.

Data source: USDA FoodData Central. Values are per 100 g of edible portion and are reference figures — they vary by variety, preparation and brand. Last updated: 2026-04-30.

Andrea'S

  • Protein 9%
  • Fat 29.3%
  • Carbs 61.7%

Teff, Cooked

  • Protein 16.3%
  • Fat 6.1%
  • Carbs 77.6%

Frequently asked questions

Which has more calories, Andrea'S or Teff, Cooked?
Per 100 g: Andrea'S has 257 kcal, Teff, Cooked has 101 kcal.
Which has more protein, Andrea'S or Teff, Cooked?
Per 100 g: Andrea'S has 5.7 g of protein, Teff, Cooked has 3.9 g.

Compare with other foods

Note. This information is provided for general reference only and is not medical advice or a diet prescription. If you have a medical condition or special dietary needs, consult a physician or a registered dietitian.